Mortgage Fraud: Surjit Singh And Rajeshwar Singh Convicted In Four Counts Of False Statements On Loan And Credit Applications

Three Defendants Convicted on All Counts for Mortgage Fraud Scheme Involving 14 Properties

<h2>Three Defendants Convicted on All Counts for Mortgage Fraud Scheme Involving 14 Properties<&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p><strong>THREE DEFENDANTS CONVICTED ON ALL COUNTS FOR MORTGAGE FRAUD SCHEME INVOLVING 14 PROPERTIES<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>SACRAMENTO&comma; Calif&period; — A federal jury in Sacramento convicted three Northern California residents today of crimes relating to their involvement in a mortgage fraud scheme&comma; U&period;S&period; Attorney Phillip A&period; Talbert announced&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>After a seven-day trial&comma; the jury found Surjit Singh&comma; 71&comma; of Dublin&comma; and his son&comma; Rajeshwar Singh&comma; 43&comma; of Pleasanton&comma; each guilty of four counts of mail fraud&comma; four counts of bank fraud&comma; and four counts of false statements on <a class&equals;"wpil&lowbar;keyword&lowbar;link" href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;fraudswatch&period;com&sol;category&sol;loans&sol;" title&equals;"loan" data-wpil-keyword-link&equals;"linked" data-wpil-monitor-id&equals;"280">loan<&sol;a> and credit applications&period; Anita Sharma&comma; 55&comma; of Gilroy&comma; was found guilty of two counts of mail fraud&comma; two counts of bank fraud&comma; and two counts of false statements on loan and credit applications&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Today’s verdict is yet another step in the efforts taken by this office and our partners at the FBI to bring to account those whose fraudulent activities contributed to the <a class&equals;"wpil&lowbar;keyword&lowbar;link" href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;fraudswatch&period;com&sol;tag&sol;financial-fraud&sol;" title&equals;"financial" data-wpil-keyword-link&equals;"linked" data-wpil-monitor-id&equals;"833">financial<&sol;a> decline which had such a tremendous impact on our communities&comma;” said U&period;S&period; Attorney Talbert&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;We are gratified by the verdict and thankful for the hard work and dedication of our investigative partners&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;One of the FBI’s top priorities is to combat major white-collar crimes such as <a class&equals;"wpil&lowbar;keyword&lowbar;link" href&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;www&period;fraudswatch&period;com&sol;category&sol;mortgage&sol;" title&equals;"mortgage" data-wpil-keyword-link&equals;"linked" data-wpil-monitor-id&equals;"123">mortgage<&sol;a> fraud&comma;” said Special Agent in Charge Sean Ragan of the FBI Sacramento Field Office&period; &OpenCurlyDoubleQuote;Mortgage fraud has negatively impacted entire communities in our region by artificially influencing home values and threatening the investments of lawful buyers&period; To ensure a bright future for our region&comma; identification and investigation of mortgage fraud schemes is imperative&period; We will continue to investigate such crimes to both deter would-be fraudsters from acting and ensure those who commit fraud face justice&period;”<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>According to court documents&comma; in 2006 and 2007&comma; Surjit Singh recruited individuals with good credit to act as straw buyers for residential properties owned by his family members and associates&period; Rajeshwar Singh&comma; a licensed real estate agent&comma; assisted in the scheme by submitting loan applications for the straw buyers&period; Anita Sharma&comma; a dental assistant at the time&comma; was one of the straw buyers&period; Because Sharma and the other straw buyers could not afford the homes based on their true incomes&comma; the Singhs submitted fraudulent loan applications and supporting material to lending institutions that included false statements about the straw buyers’ income&comma; employment&comma; liabilities&comma; and intent to occupy the homes as their primary residences&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>At least 14 properties were involved in the scheme&period; Anita Sharma alone purchased five homes in San Jose&comma; San Ramon&comma; Elk Grove&comma; Sacramento&comma; and Modesto&period; Other straw buyers purchased or refinanced properties in Stockton&comma; Modesto&comma; Patterson&comma; Lathrop and Tracy&period; All of these homes were ultimately either foreclosed upon or sold in a short sale where the bank lets homeowners sell their homes for less than is owed on the mortgage&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Sharma was paid for her involvement in the scheme&period; Rajeshwar Singh received financial benefits through broker commissions for the transactions and as the seller of seven of the properties&period; He also continued to occupy the San Ramon property at a time when Anita Sharma should have been living there&period; Surjit Singh benefitted through payments out of escrow directed to shell companies&comma; such as SJR Investments and BK Investments&comma; associated with his daughter and significant other&comma; whose initials are SJR and BK respectively&period; These payments were purportedly for contracting services&comma; which did not occur&period; He also benefitted through rental payments made to him and his significant other by the renters of the homes&comma; as the straw buyers were not living in the homes&period; In addition&comma; many of his family members received money by selling properties and had money directed to them out of escrow&period; According to court documents and evidence produced at trial&comma; the defendants were responsible for the origination of more than &dollar;9&period;3 million in fraudulently procured residential mortgage loans&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>This case is the product of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation&period; Assistant United States Attorneys Lee S&period; Bickley and Kelli L&period; Taylor are prosecuting the case&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The defendants are scheduled for sentencing on January 26&comma; 2018&period; They face a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison and a &dollar;1 million fine&period; The actual sentence&comma; however&comma; will be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of any applicable statutory factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines&comma; which take into account a number of variables&period; The court remanded Surjit Singh into custody&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Share This Article
Follow:
FraudsWatch is а site reporting on fraud and scammers on internet, in financial services and personal. Providing a daily news service publishes articles contributed by experts; is widely reported in thе latest compliance requirements, and offers very broad coverage of thе latest online theft cases, pending investigations and threats of fraud.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Exit mobile version